Here is one paper that discusses the complexities https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~archery/wp-content/uploads/docs/knsu.pdf
It is discussing an olympic recurve bow which has the same issues I discussed with the traditional bow.
Victor,thanks for your input.
I found a few papers on this phenomenon and it seems that when the arrow is released using 3 fingers on the bowstring, this imparts a lateral displacement to the arrow at the string.
Also, this phenomenon is most pr…
Thanks to Hengre and Victor. I appreciate the quick response. Its another reason I like Mecway!
I didn't use this feature much until recently and normally wouldn't have noticed so soon. Anyway, hope you can update that one soon as it is a great …
Oops, it behaves as expected now that I've added a constraint at the ID! With E=200 GPa and 1MPa external pressure, get 1.13mm deflection along x which is now symmetrical about x as expected.
Oh, done on V13Beta 2 BTW
Here's my play around. I imported the dxf, automeshed 2D, revolved 360 degrees around x-axis, cut out central section (for fun), pressurised to 1MPa on outside
Can't figure out why the deformation is not symmetrical around x?
Hi Victor
Thanks for you reply. I'll try your second suggestion first. If I use a simple spring that the piston can contact as it approaches TDC then this will simulate a piston compressing and expanding. This is a good fix for that part of the…
Hi Disla
thanks for your comments. The file that worked had tet10 3d elements and I used v11 with that too.
The file that does not work (v11) has 2d elements (tet3 or quad4).
I'm confused because I cant see any bad geometry and additionally, I us…
Disla and Victor
Are 10 node tets going to help? Here is a good discussion by VMH on this forum Aug 2015. https://mecway.com/forum/discussion/comment/431/#Comment_431
I remember being impressed with the 10 node tet thinking that for some thin str…
This a great method Disla - thank you. You have reminded me that yet another way is to click "show element surface" and then add a pressure to the end of the element.
Works well but I had problems with the shell element rotating on the beam element. I think this is because there is no drilling degree of freedom in this case. I put extra beam elements in to stop rotation
Thanks Disla for the tip
Simon
Thanks for all of your work and advice. That has helped a lot.
Yes, I am convinced you are correct - it is hard. I did a little with several big name codes a few years back. Can't say I was impressed then. I was trying to model impact fo…
Thanks Victor
That is very wierd? Do u think that this is a ccx bug/peculiarity?
Maybe the arm you added gives the moment something to push on:)
Some searching of the Calculix ccx info on beam elements:
http://web.mit.edu/calculix_v2.7/CalculiX…
Sergio
I finally finished a run with a refined 8 node version of the test strip. I have attached the liml and inp files as requested below as well as a few images.
This version use fairly realistic material - Bilinear withe 250MPa yield and Tange…
Sergio
I meant that I ran your model down and up to completion to 29.9mm deflection (T=1.0 sec) on my machine using v7.0. When I first ran your model on v7.0 , it stopped at T=0.33 sec. When I unticked automatic time steps, it ran to completion (T…
Sergio
I ran your exact file in v7.0 with automatic steps unticked and it ran to completion which it would not do before. Before with automatick ticked, V7.0 would stop at T=0.33sec.
I stopped its motion at 29.9 sec to avaoid explosion.
Barrti
Sergio
Thanks so much for all of the work you have put into this. I'm not finished yet but I followed your suggestions and got an improvement when I used 8 node elements and also simplified the restraint. I got greater movement and the strip was a…
Victor,
Thanks for this. I am trying to get about 10mm movement of the big block -i.e 90 degrees bend. I followed your instructions and eventually got about 5mm by increasing the Contact stiffness to about 100xE.
I still cant get the 90 degree b…