From the results, ccx2.10 version from Kwip and GE has identical results. ccx2.8p2 and ccx2.10 versions had slightly different results for the shell elements.
OK. Sorry for all the hoops you've had to jump through. The scaling will be more uniform in the next version and it will probably double the size of graphics items above 150% but not at 150%. I see fr
Victor, setting a custom scaling in Windows to 149% got the icons smaller than what I had in Version 4 (which was a great size) but this is okay for now. Thanks
That's how it is in version 5. These items are only getting scaled by multiples of 100%, so they don't scale smoothly with the DPI setting. In previous versions, they didn't scale at all. Now they jum
Victor, I just had a chance to try version 5 on my laptop and the icons on top are blurry and so large now and also the triad is large compared to the previous version (the tree is still good). Not
Hope this help. I did it quick test on a simple free-standing column on Mecway version 5.0, CCX2.8p2 using 4"x4"x36"; E=29e3ksi, Poisson ratio=0.3, Yield=36ksi, Tangent Modulus=210.3ks
In version 5, PEEQ ("Equivalent plastic strain" in Mecway) comes through automatically if one of the plastic material types is set. For hand-made material definitions though, you'd have to d
Hello drssp. It doesn't currently have a materials database though this is a commonly requested feature so hopefully in a future version. For now, you would have to get material data from elsewhere, s
with brief explanation what is what and what MY version was used may be quite useful. It may be quite interesting having models from various backgrounds
OK, my v5beta version generates quite strange output -not really realistic. I must admit I haven't spend a lot of time on it and I run out of 1000 nodes which doesn't probably help as well with regard
Good point about consistency with scale/copy. I'm reluctant to change old features after the beta though. Please put new change requests in another thread so this one can be about the beta version.