I see it happening now by solving several times, on both your model and one I made. Thanks for discovering this and isolating it to the multithreaded version! I'll try compiling with lower optimization or remove it if it's still going wrong.
Is that the ccx_MT.exe with Mecway or from Kwip? I can't reproduce the problem. Do you mind sending me a .liml or .inp file that does it? If it's going to be unpredictably wrong like this, I'd better remove it from Mecway.
I'm still not sure quite what's happening with Salome and whether it's a good idea to assume all .unv units are unreliable or not so I've added a persistent option in v7 beta 3 in Tools -> Labs -> Ignore units in .unv files which causes it to …
Thanks for the feedback. It currently doesn't let you solve two configurations at the same time. I'll look into it stopping the first solve because that doesn't sound like very good behavior.
I've also compiled the multithreaded version (ccx_MT.ex…
There are two possible things happening here:
A) Is it just showing a different default choice, so that you can easily switch to mm to read them? or
Is the physical meaning wrong, so that what should be 1 mm ends up as 1 m or 1000 mm?
For A),…
Yes, that's a missing feature of Mecway 6 sorry. However, version 7 which is now in beta does write *FILM for convection but not *RADIATE. Thanks for posting the Excel VBA code to generate them.
http://mecway.com/forum/discussion/401/version-7-beta
Thanks for finding these bugs with configurations. It should show two different results. I've been able to reproduce both the corrupted display and the common solution for both configurations and will fix them for the final release of v7. For the se…
You can copy the first 10000 lines of a large file quickly in PowerShell with:
gc -TotalCount 10000 InputFileName.liml > OutputFileName.liml
The number of lines for the model will be more than the number of nodes plus the number of elements…
The overall structure of the file is like this:
[ ... model definition ...]
[ ... model definition that was used for the solution ... ]
[ ... results data ...]
so if the end of the file is truncated or…
For the heat flux at the boundary, I think CCX calculates heat flux at the element integration points then extrapolates to the nodes whereas Mecway does it directly at the nodes. That might be the reason for the difference but I would still expect …
Thanks too Andrea. Just a warning - it doesn't capture bending and twisting moments that would exist with an offset joint like this. Sergio corrected that above by making it symmetric, although with rigid body instead of distributing coupling.
Thi…
This is because there are nodes on the slave surface of a bonded contact which are also slaves or other bonded contacts or constraints. The slave nodes aren't allowed to be part of any other constraint.
You could work around this by removing one e…
Not easily. You could generate the relevant parts of the liml file with a script or spreadsheet.
The equation:
3 = 1(1/m)×ux1 + 2(1/m)×uy2
is stored as:
However, perhaps there's another way to achieve what…
I see. It's too minor for including any time soon though. There's also the converse problem where it should average at boundaries like bonded contact with the same material and symmetry planes.
This is the flexible joint on beam under Loads & Constraints. It's sometimes a little tricky since you need to apply it to the end "face" of a beam. See Help -> Manual -> 10.9 Flexible joint on beam if you have trouble selecting the face.
…
I see an abstract here http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1628315
It sounds like it would be more convenient - don't make so many lines, just a small number of planes? I'm surprised someone's come up with a…
That sounds OK. Can you attach the .liml file and explain what's wrong with the results?
An important effect is that Mecway applies convection to both the inside and outside of the pipe. If you only want the outside, it might be better to use a no…
Not sure if it has a name but these are the formulas it uses:
σ = total stress tensor transformed so the x-axis is aligned with the SCL.
t = thickness.
t/2
1 /
σ_membrane = - | σ dx
…
Thanks for the suggestions.
1. I agree it is very nice but low priority. You can use left/right click on the axis triad in the corner to get 6 orthogonal views.
2. Oneday I hope.
3. You can use the "pressure" load instead of force. If you …
Hello. Somebody here might be able to help, but this forum is mainly for the Mecway software. You'll probably have better luck on an ANSYS forum such as http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=569