How to connect/weld parallel Beam Elements (unifilar model) without shared nodes?

Hello everyone,

I am working on a structural model in Mecway using Beam Elements (wireframe model). I have a specific question regarding how to simulate a welded connection between components that are physically separated in the geometry.

My Scenario:
I have a 'sandwich' assembly consisting of:

A top square hollow section (tube).

A flat bar in the middle.

A bottom square hollow section (tube).

In the real world, the flat bar is welded to the outer faces of both the top and bottom tubes. However, since I am using line elements, I don't have physical surfaces to select and use the Contact (Bonded) command. When I run the solver, the three elements act independently and the load is not transferred.

My Question:
What is the best 'standard procedure' to 'glue' or 'weld' these parallel lines together so they act as a single rigid unit?

Should I use Rigid Constraints (RBE2) to link the corresponding nodes vertically?

Is there a way to create an automatic link or coupling between these parallel lines?

Or is it better to create manual 'connector' beam elements with very high stiffness (high Young's Modulus) to simulate the weld?

I am looking for a reliable way to ensure the 'sandwich' works together without having to model the entire structure as solids.

Any advice or 'recipe' on how to set this up correctly would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

Comments

  • As a beam model is a simplification of 3D structure, I would just create 2D elements between the center nodes of the hollow beams, all with coincident nodes. If I need to get more accurate stresses would replace with shell elements the hollow beams.
  • There are several possible approaches, one is with beams and some sort of connection or another beam as u outline in ur question, then there is the option of beams connected by a shell or even a solid. The 3d shape and sort of loading may make one solution better than others. I have had more success (and less frustration) with using solid models. If u went down this path I would use ur CAD to make a 2D section of from the model u show, export as a .stp then import it to Mecway. Do some nice 2D meshes the extrude it. This avoids any connections what so ever
  • Although you don't want shared nodes between the SHS and web, would you tolerate sharing the nodes of all 3 parts by modelling them all as beams with element offset to define their relative positions? This is a technique you can use to build up a beam section from simpler ones.


  • tem como você me mandar esse arquivo do mecway para eu abrir ele?
  • Hello,

    I am a Project Engineer performing a structural validation of a spreader bar. I have already prepared the following:

    A complete wireframe skeleton modeled in Mecway.

    The corresponding AutoCAD 3D wireframe for reference.

    A custom cross-section in AutoCAD (DXF) consisting of two square tubes joined by a flat bar.

    The Problem:
    I need this custom section to follow the entire perimeter of the lower frame of my wireframe. However, I am stuck on the following points:

    Workflow: Should I import the section first and then assign it to the lines, or must the lines be converted to a specific element type (like Beam) before they can receive this geometry?

    Path Mapping: How do I make this specific DXF profile run or sweep along the entire length of the lower lines automatically?

    Interface Issues: My version does not show 'Properties' in the component right-click menu, making it difficult to switch from Line to Beam.

    I am validating equipment that has already been manufactured, so I must use the exact geometry of this 'sandwich' section to get accurate stress and moment of inertia results.

    Please provide a detailed step-by-step on how to map this DXF section onto my existing wireframe.

    Thank you,
    Marcos
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!