Hello,
I have some
1) Does it possible to add Suppress option for components (meshed parts) like it is implemented for "Loads & Constrains" elements ?
2) Does it possible to split analysis data for several files, like geometry and general definitions(loads constrains contacts) , mesh, results?
3) Could be added an option to change names for "Load & Constrain Elements" ?
It could significantly simplify debugging of complex analyses.
Best Regards,
Alex
Comments
1) Unlikely because of consecutive node numbering which makes this tricky.
2) No. Although you can get it to save the solution to a separate file with Analysis -> New save after solve.
3) I'm expecting to have either named loads or named load groups or both for the next version (14).
I'll see about having the SCL appear when it's defined before closing the window. It should already appear when you click on it on the outline tree.
There doesnt seem to be support for standard file types like NASTRAN, Abaqus. Is there any intent to support NASTRAN file import [dat, bdf,etc] Being able to pull in existing work or review results from completed work [OP2,FO6,XDB] is also of great use. Abaqus is less useful, but still appealing as an industry standard.
Do you provide any test cases with the trial software? All my available work would exceed 1000 nodes easily. Do you have test cases to evaluate the software that dont fall under this limitation?
I was referred here by NASTRAN-95, and the Mystran website. Your software is impressive, but i am struggling to find usefulness in it. I will admit I am new to Calculix and equally impressed with it, but there doesnt appear to be any way to translate work between the two.
Just day one thoughts, ill keep playing around and get in touch with tech support for additional questions on this topic.
Some of the people working on Mystran and pyNastran are trying to make a converter from .inp to .bdf/dat. But at the moment, I don't think there's a way to use Mystran with Mecway.
There are samples, verification cases and tutorials which all fit within 1000 nodes. These are described in Help->Manual and Help->Tutorials. You could generate bigger models by refining some of those but they won't solve with the free version.
SimCommons examples all run in under 1000 nodes.
1) Pre-definition of units
Is there a way to make the adjustment for unit (m , mm, in etc.) in the Geometrie --> Meshing Parameters storeable for example in the default model. Or any other method of pre-definition.
Unfortunately Mecway starts always (and for each Step-file) with "m", why it is (at least for me to 99,9%) necessary to change it to "mm" for mechanical engineering.
I'm also wondering about making the default units persist after closing the application, but not sure if it would create more annoyances.
If the named load groups (folders) is still in the works for ver. 14, I'm wondering if the needle has moved yet for adding a multiplier (Co-Factor) outside of the group? This multiplier would apply to all the loads within the group, and would save a LOT of editing time in multi-force models that currently requires the Edit of each individual load. The hope is this could be done within the user interface, without resorting to batch editing external to Mecway.
I resurrect a previous screen-shot from LISA (showing the folders) that I made comments on. One sympathizes with Engineers for all the various load cases that must be investigated under the International Building Code.
Finally, a word of appreciation for all the improvements made to date and the helpful advice given.
just two more suggestion - category nice to have :
1) Is it possible to set individual names for loads and constraints?
(may be behind the actual information: +heat flux <2kW/m2> - individual string
2) Would it be possible to make a country specific selection for the representation of decimal numbers ( dot 12.23 or comma 12,23). For entering numbers in Mecway menues and for Output to Excel. (Not for importing of CAD data etc.)
Regards
Multiplicative constants - probably but it might be in the form of constants you can include in load formulas and not quite as visual as what's shown on your screenshot.
Load groups - maybe
Country specific input format - It's a bit tricky because some inputs are formulas which already use commas for other things. Hopefully there's a way to make it work. I'll add it to my list but it's low priority.
Tools-->Options-->Calculix--> [ ] Solver(1) e.g. CCX_2.17
[*] Solver(2) e.g. ccx_paradiso_2.17
[ ] Solver(3) e.g. CCX_2.16
Makes it a bit easier to switch if neccessary. Just for information, to think over.
Regards
FYI, PASTIX has failed on me for thermals involving pipe flow elements, and has diverged for nonlinear contact models with hyperelastic elements. PARDISO ran slower, but it converged. I leave all 3 available, and since the *SUBMODEL command was fixed in 2.16, have not had to go back to SPOOLES.
yes you are right. It is a trivial matter. It was only a nice to have suggestion
*STATIC,SOLVER=SPOOLES
or
*STATIC,SOLVER=PARDISO
or
*STATIC,SOLVER=PaStiX
for (from ccx 2.17 manual):
*BUCKLE, *COUPLED TEMPERATURE-DISPLACEMENT, *DYNAMIC, *ELECTROMAGNETICS, *FREQUENCY, *GREEN, *HEAT TRANSFER, *MODAL DYNAMIC, *STATIC, *STEADY STATE DYNAMICS, *UNCOUPLED TEMPERATURE-DISPLACEMENT,
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zd7fj0ceaj8j44n/CalculiX.7z?dl=0
This archive contains the ccx version linked to SPOOLES, PARADISO and PASTIX
(ccx_PASTIXandPARDISO.exe).
thanks
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zd7fj0ceaj8j44n/CalculiX.7z?dl=0
This archive contains the ccx version linked to SPOOLES, PARADISO and PASTIX
(ccx_PASTIXandPARDISO.exe).
I could run all the solvers. But for Pastix I found no GPU is used. In the Calculix forum I read something about setting environment variable PASTIX_GPU=1 (1,2,3...?)
I tried with 1 for a simple beam modell. 1. run without environment variable, and got a result. Setting the environment variable to 1 i didn't get any solver output and no error messages.
Can you give some explanation on how to use the GPU with that versions.
Merry X-mas
It is possible that in the future GPU support will be possible thanks to StarPU with OpenCL (AMD, nvidia and so on).
between to create a node at the centroid of the selected nodes.
It would be nice if that could also be used to set a node on the center of a circle. At time it doesn't do.
Is a nice to have function, but may sometimes help
Edited: Actually it´s possible to create named selection of several faces, even from different parts, sorry for the mistake. What is not possible is to add or remove faces once the name selection is created.
Regards
¿Could you add the possibility to generate a Surface into the Mesh tool > Create > Surface from a given Contour (Sorted list of nodes)?
I mean, being able to enter a sorted set of points that once closed would generate the inner surface into the geometry tree. 2D tool would be a beginning, very nice and enough for me.
Once the Surface is created one could define the meshing parameters on it to generate the surface mesh, revolve, extrude,....
By other hand, I found that the Node/Element editing tool into the MeshTool menu is slow. It has a big potential, but the dialog box is opened for each node/element every time you want to edit.
¿Could we edit the nodes and elements directly like in a spreadsheet or even copy and paste from and Excel or Notepad file?
Thanks
I would like if the LeftShift key could be used to select a group of Named selections.
Actually, you need to select them one by one.
I'm not sure if this depends on MECWAY but, ¿ is it possible to have the preview option in the file explorer for the liml files?
Thanks