Comments

• A useful feature could be the possibility to hide some elements of a single component. now is only possible hide components

  in Improvement suggestions Comment by LRIGA July 2022
• Yes for first I was looking for a solution thanks for help disla

  in hide elements of single component Comment by LRIGA July 2022
• Thanks disla, I think that an "hide elements" button could be useful, I hope that Victor add this feature in future release

  in hide elements of single component Comment by LRIGA July 2022
• Thanks disla, I think that an "hide elements" button could be useful, I hope that Victor add this feature in future release

  in hide elements of single component Comment by LRIGA July 2022
• Ok, clearly my hope are not mandatory for Calculix developer but I belive that an explicit code should manage contacts+plastic+dynamics...soon or late

  in Explicit Analysis Comment by LRIGA September 2021
• Hi JohnM, Thanks for sharing I should study more deeper how solver work. I've notice that shell elements works not well with explicit (only error for now but could be a problem of my setting) I hope that next releases of calculix improve explicit so…

  in Explicit Analysis Comment by LRIGA August 2021
• Hi Victor, thanks for your support. Sad too read that plastic and contacts don't work thogether. You know if this is a bug that could be fixed in the next release of calculix? Thanks again

  in Explicit Analysis Comment by LRIGA August 2021
• With dynamic in my list I mean explicit dynamic, I’m new in mecway and calculix and I’ve not found the way to call explicit solver from mecway gui directly Could you explain me how use gui for this?

  in Explicit Analysis Comment by LRIGA August 2021
• Hi Sergio, did you mean this example (see attached) that seem to be implicit dynamic there is a way to create a mecway model with contact+plastic material behavior+dynamic like in other explicit solver, for example like in Radioss? Add DYNAMIC,EXPLI…

  in Explicit Analysis Comment by LRIGA August 2021
• Thanks Sergio, I've search for that calculix keyword as you suggest (https://web.mit.edu/calculix_v2.7/CalculiX/ccx_2.7/doc/ccx/node253.html) I've attached a simple example for someone who have the same question, red arrow for initial applied force…

  in local csys Comment by LRIGA August 2021
• It is clear that the differencies (if the tria appear far away of location of interest) should be negligible, but my question was about the possibility of having a quad mesh for such a simple example. I understand that at the moment this is not pos…

  in 2D quad mesh performance Comment by LRIGA August 2021
• Tankyou Sergio, You are right, mesh has good quality but not good enought considering the simile geometry ( quad only mesh should be the right chioice for this example)I know that automesh code is not simiple to develop. Thanks for your suggestions

  in 2D quad mesh performance Comment by LRIGA August 2021