The version of CCX with Mecway 19 (and the source) is patched to allow all other element types except user elements to be used in the same model as laminates.
Can you use the CCX solver? It's much faster at MPCs. For 800 000 nodes, you would probably need to compile the MKL version with OOC whose source code is included with Mecway. I'm not sure if we've ta
One more question - are you using either version 19 or the patch for version 18 that updates MKL? Older versions had a very old MKL library that has problems on some workstations.
update; did a quick test with the current version. it looks like you can define custom element orientations, but not in the same way as for shells. thus, i can't get the layout i would need. i'll emai
Below is a link to the latest version of this example. As the OP of this thread found, it serves as a pretty good performance benchmark, also. The mesh size will max out 16gb of physical memory. So if
Someone once asked for the CCX inp files of this example. So I added them to the download. I noticed that I didn't update something in the spreadsheet that I meant to. I fixed that now. This was the n
I was writing a fuller comment, but thought I'd give a shorter version first, to save anyone having to wade through the long and rambling comment that is on its way.
the last remaining oddity is you will get a random amount of phase shifted duplicate modes. they seem to occur for the higher nodal diameters. on this version of the fan model, i had 18 of those. the
By other hand, love the new version. Shape modes have much more sense now. I can't resist to post other model. It could be one of the strange creatures from Captain Nemo.
Version 19 (beta here https://mecway.com/download/mecway190_Beta5.msi ) has elastic compression-only supports for CCX which sounds like what you're looking for.
i have a bunch of models for two different configs. however, i'm using a beta version of Mecway. so not sure if you can open them. i would also have to clear the results. so you would have to resolve