Stuck? 
support@mecway.com
support@mecway.com
Mecway
FEA
MikeMcMullen
About
- Username
- MikeMcMullen
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,951
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Will Paraview in this context work with Windows?
-
I believe the Calculix manual describes this in 6.9.7 of the CCX_2.19 manual. I think this is only in Explicit analysis. And yes there needs to be mass to use mass scaling. I have not gotten into explicit analysis in calculix yet as I am still ru…
-
In practice here in the US, for civil structures, especially bridges, torque is not used directly. Calibrated crush washers, turn of the nut, or torque jobsite determined on a sampling of bolts and nuts with the same grip, washers, batch, using a h…
-
My experience too. Now when running huge problems in Calculix (2,000,000 nodes +) it will trim itself down to under 2 GB from 8GB or so at the start. Yeah Victor!
-
I had a sucesssful rin witn Mecway internal (Spooles I think) with about 4.3 million nodes. Worked OK if you have a day and night for a run. Screen sluggish viewing results too. MKL Pardiso will run non-lin on 2 Meg of nodes in about an hour.
-
My experience with out of core and an SSD is that the bandwidth required is within the capabilities of a SATA SSD. Apparently a lot of overhead in the operating and Callculix or Mecway with the writing. What seems to work though is the freeing up …
-
3rav--- I am successfully running your 31 August version of ccx with pastix thanks to your instructions, but it gags on 1, 890,000 nodes in iteration 1. I believe this is due to nnz being about 6.9 GB. Reading in the Pastix documentation it gives …
-
Seems to work (running now pastix) on yesterday's release.
-
I have a long list of ccx.exe files. They are all different depending on what was included in the compilation. Some don't work for me. Whatever Victor provides works, but is not the bleeding latest. Paradiso is proprietary, so he can't provide i…
-
I saw prop_designs intermittant multi core use with earlier versions last year.
-
4 Threads Pastix (25 wrz 2020 08:54:48 Windows from 3rav) shown above, about 3 seconds slower than 8 threads. 6 threads a tad less than 8 threads. 5 threads a tad worse than 4. CPU utilization a function of # of threads for either verision of CCX.…
-
OK, Mecway 14 Static 3D, Out of core of a 1 span prestressed girder bridge with Hex20 elements. Mostly 8 elements thick for analysis of rail impact loads from a 36000 kg truck. 929180 elements, 4083375 nodes. Run using 4 cpu's of a Ryzen …
-
Last run mentioned was 3:11:33 run time. Trying a slightly larger version of the problem 4588000 nodes failed with a P-2 message at the start of solving the Matrix at 46:00, decreased to 4083375 nodes, but with probably a significantly wider bandwi…
-
Mecway 14 using intermal solver may be a good choice for linear large problems. I just reran one of my problem sets, and then changed all the elements from Hex8 to Hex20 drastically increasing the problem size. Using 4 cores: Hex8, 391680 element…
-
Yeah, and I use windows. My last update was a compile with the latest MKL paradiso which required a Linux shell (I used msys2-Shell), a makefile, all the pieces, and a lot of intel files direct from intel. My first compile in many a year. A littl…
-
Don't quite know about out of core but I have useda Pcie 4.0 SSD for a Windows page file. Probably Ok for offloading the few GB of largely unused other stuff in Memory (some chuncks of Mecway too) but doubtfully cost effective if swapping while so…
-
I have been looking into this and have concluded that at the current time for MecWay and Calculix the video card makes little difference. Most of the prior development in to the types of solving libraries in the public domain or GPL are a little ol…
-
Thank you as well! I would like total strain as well, especially with the recent speedups. Having a linear part to speed up calculations as well as a non-linear part does not seem as important with the speeding up of the computers, solvers, Mecway …
-
I will probably be looking into this as well, once I get my FEM skills up to speed. Besides looking into better resistance models from the impacted side of things, I am interested in the fall off of force effects with distance and intervening mass,…
