Improvement for next versions of Mecway

sofien_73sofien_73
I Victor,
Maybe for the next version it can be included the possibility to manage modal -spectral analysis.
It could be very usefull for steelworks frame earthquake analysis in accordance with the Eurocode 8 standard.

Regards.

Comments

  • sofien_73sofien_73
    Sorry, for this post, i've read the Mecway user guide for sure it can be done with the dynamic response analysis.

    Regards
  • protontimprotontim
    It would be nice to be able to add labels to the computed solutions so it can be easily seen what they refer to. See below.

  • protontimprotontim
    Another help would be to be able to import a step file with multiple bodies (assembly) and have each of those bodies created in the Mecway design tree. As it is I have to import many individual files each with only one body.
  • protontimprotontim
    Also the ability to handle laminates like carbon fiber layups. I know this might be a reach but it would be great to have.
  • VictorVictor
    The next version (25) will probably have support for Alibre Design/Atom3D assemblies where each part becomes a separate component in Mecway. Not for general STEP files but I hope to find a way to achieve that because assemblies are quite important.
  • prop_designprop_design
    @protontim

    Mecway has had the capability to do composite layups for quite some time.
  • SergioSergio
    @Victor , Alibre assembly support will be a great advance. Will use native or step files created by the application?
  • VictorVictor
    STEP
  • polymathicpolymathic
    edited May 9
    protontim: It would be nice to be able to add labels to the computed solutions so it can be easily seen what they refer to. See below.

    +1 to this! :)
  • VictorVictor
    I prefer if feature requests go in Github https://github.com/victorkemp/Mecway/issues so they don't get lost and other people can upvote them (thumbs up reaction).
  • GermanGerman
    I found that if you change the size of the table window, the message "More info" does not change its position, so it can be aout of view.




  • GermanGerman
    Victor, you should put the link to Github somewere visible in the frum or website because whern we have a feature suggestion we don't remember the Github link.
  • prop_designprop_design
    Honestly, I'm not a fan of github and don't want to create an account there just to suggest stuff. It would be better to do it some other way, in my opinion. A way that doesn't require us to create more accounts.
  • VictorVictor
    Good points @German and @prop_design. Sometimes I copy requests onto Github myself.

    That's an embarrassing mistake with the more info label!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register